Navigation

Ozone-Friendly Agricultural Products Are Goal of New Global Initiative

Recommend:

More than 5,000 farms and organizations joined forces with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to accelerate the phase-out of an agricultural pesticide that damages the ozone layer, the Earth’s protective shield.

More than 5,000 farms and organizations joined forces with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to accelerate the phase-out of an agricultural pesticide that damages the ozone layer, the Earth’s protective shield.

 

Methyl bromide has been used by farmers to kill pests in the soil before planting crops like tomatoes, strawberries, melons and flowers.

 

But in 1992 it was officially controlled as an ozone-depleting substance and is scheduled to be phased-out under the Montreal Protocol, the international treaty set up to protect the ozone layer.

 

The new International Partnership for Phasing-out Methyl Bromide brings

together many farms and companies that have shown leadership in protecting the ozone layer.

 

These include farmers’ associations and supermarkets such as Marks &

Spencer and Co-op – with international organizations such as UNEP, FAO, UNIDO, UNDP, GTZ, MPS and CAB International.

 

The Partnership aims to accelerate the world-wide switch from methyl

bromide to ozone-friendly alternatives.

 

Shafqat Kakakhel, UNEP’s Deputy Executive Director and Officer in Charge, said:  “The battle to restore the ozone layer, which protects all life on Earth from harmful solar ultra-violet radiation, has been one of the great environmental success stories with a wide range of chemicals such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) already largely phased out under the Montreal Protocol.”

 

“However, methyl bromide, one of the last on the list, is proving harder to remove with some farmers convinced that the alternatives are ineffective or too costly.  By demonstrating the fact that thousands of farms and companies can grow, source and sell products without using this chemical, the Partnership sends a clear signal that a methyl bromide-free world is possible sooner rather than later”, he added.

 

A survey carried out for the Partnership has so far identified more than 5,000 commercial farms that produce tomatoes, peppers, melons, strawberries and flowers without using methyl bromide.  The farms are located in more than 30 countries around the world.

 

The Partnership plans to establish a business-to-business (B2B) net-based service, linking grocery stores seeking goods produced without methyl bromide with farmers and suppliers who do not use methyl bromide.  This will link with agricultural certification organizations (e.g. MPS, AENOR)so that companies can confidently purchase flowers, strawberries, tomatoes, melons and other products that are certified as grown without methyl bromide.

 

Farms and companies that join the Partnership have already stopped using methyl bromide or will pledge to halt their use of methyl bromide by September 2007, in celebration of the 20th anniversary of the Montreal Protocol.

 

The Partnership is a public-private initiative, which encourages companies to take voluntary steps to augment national environmental regulations that control methyl bromide.

 

Statements by leadership companies and organizations that support the

International Partnership: "Farmers in Almería region produce almost 60 per cent of the vegetables exported from Spain – tomatoes, peppers, eggplant, melons, and others”, said Juan Colomina Figueredo, Managing Director of Coexphal – the Association of Farmers and Exporters of Fruit and Vegetables in Almería, Spain. “Several years ago our farmers eliminated methyl bromide from this very large agricultural region, and supermarket customers are happy with the results.  Our farmers also found that alternatives are economically viable in this highly competitive sector."

 

“4,500 farms in more than 30 countries are members of the international MPS organization that certifies standards of good agricultural practice.  These farms produce cut flowers, ornamentals and vegetables without using any methyl bromide”, said Theo de Groot, Managing Director of MPS. “Organizations like MPS audit and certify the farms, ensuring that supermarkets and other customers will receive products that are better for the environment and society.”

 

“Marks & Spencer supports the desire to see a world growing fresh produce without needing to use methyl bromide”, said Emmett Lunny, Senior Technologist for Marks & Spencer supermarket.  “Sterilising the same piece of land, without rotations, is not good agricultural practice.  There are many other options available (chemical & non-chemical) backed up by scientific research.  Our Egyptian strawberry supplier, for example, has this year completely phased-out methyl bromide.”

 

“Methyl bromide is a broad-spectrum pest control method which kills both harmful and beneficial organisms”, said Dr. Niek van der Graaff of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).  “FAO has facilitated farmers’ field school training and IPM learning for growers in Africa and other regions, enabling them to adopt more sustainable pest control methods and thereby eliminate methyl bromide.  Farmers are pleased with the use of certain non-chemical alternatives for soil pest control because they are economically feasible and environmentally safe.  FAO provides technical support to continue activities to phase-out methyl bromide soil treatments through IPM training.”

 

“UNIDO has been working since 1997 with farms in developing countries,

providing training and helping to adopt MB alternatives on farms”, said Mr Guillermo Castellá Lorenzo, Programme Manager, Multilateral Environmental Agreements Branch of the UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). “To date, these projects have phased-out more than 3,100 tonnes of methyl bromide.  In our experience, with proper training and technology-transfer, farms can successfully produce crops like flowers, tobacco, tomatoes,peppers, melons, and strawberries without using methyl bromide.”   "We are pleased to support the Partnership to reward farmers for protecting the stratospheric ozone layer", said Dr. Suely Carvalho, Chief Montreal Protocol Unit, Energy and Environment Group, of the UN Development Programme (UNDP).  "Within its role to link and coordinate global and national efforts to reach the Millennium Development Goals, UNDP assists countries to both protect the environment and reduce poverty.  In this regard, UNDP has been working with many countries to eliminate the use of methyl bromide.  UNDP is committed to ensure the goals of the Montreal Protocol are met.”

 

Organizations that support the Partnership include the following:

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) -- www.unep.org/ozone

UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) --

www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPP/IPM/Web_Brom/welcome.htm

United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO) --

www.unido.org/en/doc/29643

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) --

www.undp.org/montrealprotocol/prog_activities_new1.htm

GTZ-Proklima -- www2.gtz.de/proklima/english/sectors/mebr/

Co-operative Group UK -- http://www.co-op.co.uk/

MPS agricultural certification programme -- www.my-mps.com

Marks and Spencer -- http://www.marksandspencer.com/

CAB International agricultural organisation -- http://www.cabi-bioscience.org/

 

Parts of the ozone layer have become significantly thinner (depleted)

compared to the 1970s, due to the use of chemicals such as CFCs, halons and methyl bromide (MB).  A Canadian Government study in 1997 estimated that phasing-out ozone-depleting substances under the Montreal Protocol will prevent the occurrence of about 129 million cases of eye cataracts and 20 million cases of skin cancer, as well as providing other health benefits. In addition, it prevents damage to fisheries, damage to agriculture and industrial materials, giving a net benefit of more than $224 billion. (1) Protecting the ozone layer therefore prevents huge costs to industry, Government and public health.

 

As a result of controls place on MB by Governments of the world under the Montreal Protocol, the consumption of MB in industrialized countries was reduced from more than 56,000 tonnes in 1991 to about 14,500 tonnes in 2003 (excluding quarantine treatments), and consumption has also been reduced in many developing countries.  Globally, 106 countries reported that they did not consume MB in 2003, except for treatment of quarantine pests in some cases – 55 of these countries used MB in the past.

 

As a result, the quantity of MB detected in the atmosphere has fallen

significantly since 1998.(2) While this shows admirable progress,

scientists have warned against complacency - many small, remaining uses of MB risk negating the gains achieved to date.(2) Scientists have noted that the ozone layer will not recover if the Montreal Protocol phase-out commitments are not implemented in full.

 

Reports and case studies published by UNEP (3), the Methyl Bromide

Technical Options Committee (MBTOC) (4), the FAO (5), the European

Commission (6), the Nordic Council of Ministers and other bodies have

identified a wide range of chemical and non-chemical substitutes that

control the same pests for which MB is used.  These substitutes are now

used by many farms and companies in all regions of the world.

 

Farms and companies who comply with certified standards of agricultural

production such as AENOR UNE 155001 (fruit and vegetables, http://www.aenor.es/),MPS (flowers, fruit and vegetables, http://www.my-mps.com/) and EUREP-GAP (flowers. http://www.eurepgap.org/), are not permitted to use MB.

 

For information about the Montreal Protocol, see www.unep.org/ozone

 

Footnotes

(1)  Source:  ‘Science Symposium: Challenges and Perspectives – Ozone Layer Protection’ in ‘Report of 16th Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol’, document UNEP/OzL.Pro.16/17, UNEP 2004, pages 98-100.

(2)  Source: ‘The Right Choice at the Right Time. The Global Benefits and Costs of the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer’ Environment Canada, Government of Canada 1997.

(3)  See http://www.uneptie.org/ozonaction/library/mmcfiles/2660-e.pdf

(4)  See http://www.uneptie.org/ozonaction/library/mmcfiles/3992-e.pdf

(5)  See http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPP/IPM/Web_Brom/welcome.htm

(6)  See http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/ozone/lisbon_conference.htm

 

For more information, please contact:

Nick Nuttall, Spokesperson, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP),

Nairobi, Kenya,

Tel: +254-20-762-3084,

Mobile in Kenya +254-733-632755,

Mobile when traveling

+41-79-596-5737

Fax +254-20-762-3692

nick.nuttall@unep.org

 

or

Elisabeth Waechter, UNEP Associate Media Officer,

Tel: +254-20-762-3088

Mobile: +254-720-173968

elisabeth.waechter@unep.org

 

or

Jim Sniffen

Information Officer

UN Environment Programme

New York

tel: +1-212-963-8094/8210

info@nyo.unep.org

 

http://www.nyo.unep.org/

 

UNEP is solely responsible for the contents of this press release of April 4, 2006.

 

Latest articles

Agriculture

Air Pollution

Biodiversity

Desertification

Endangered Species

Energy

Exhibits

Forests

Global Climate Change

Global Health

Industry

Natural Disaster Relief

News and Special Reports

Oceans, Coral Reefs

Pollution

Population

Public Health

Rivers

Sanitation

Toxic Chemicals

Transportation

Waste Management

Water

Water and Sanitation

Yale Himalaya Initiative